Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
9
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
McLaren gets picked to make a more powerful battery for Formula E[2016/09/29]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
Global Reinforced Plastics Industry[2016/09/27]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]