Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Didi and Baic signed a strategic cooperation agreement to build a new energy vehicle operator[2018/03/08]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
English Web For RHI INC[2014/04/08]
-
Wireless Charging: Coming Soon to an Electric Vehicle Near You[2016/10/28]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]