Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
U.S. Designates Electric Vehicle Charging Corridors[2016/11/04]
-
2016years Reach Test Report[2016/09/11]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Henrik Fisker is using a revolutionary new battery to power his Tesla killer[2016/10/17]